Differences between linguists and nonlinguists in intuitions of grammaticality-acceptability
- 1 January 1973
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Psycholinguistic Research
- Vol. 2 (2) , 83-98
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01067203
Abstract
Modern transformational grammarians, using only their own intuitions as the basic data for rule construction, may not be analyzing the common, natural language of the speech community. Do native speakers share the intuitions of linguists? One hundred and fifty exemplar sentences from 6 linguists' articles were presented to 43 linguistically naive and 22 linguistically nonnaive native speakers. Native speakers agreed among themselves as to the acceptability or unacceptability of 80% of the sentences. Subjects shared intuitions with linguists in only a half of the exemplars. It is suggested that linguists consult nonlinguists as to the acceptability of exemplars, which illustrate the rules proposed, as a check that those rules reflect the formal structure of the common language being described.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Deep and Surface Structure Constraints in SyntaxLanguage, 1973
- Some principles of linguistic methodologyLanguage in Society, 1972
- Some Experiments with Queer SentencesLanguage and Speech, 1969
- Verbal transformation effect and auditory perceptual mechanisms.Psychological Bulletin, 1968
- Semantic satiation and generation: Learning? Adaptation?Psychological Bulletin, 1964
- Stimulus-Characteristics as Determinants of Semantic Changes with Repeated PresentationThe American Journal of Psychology, 1964
- Verbal transformations and an effect of instructional bias on perception.Canadian Journal of Psychology / Revue canadienne de psychologie, 1963
- PAIRED‐ASSOCIATE LEARNING AS A FUNCTION OF STIMULUS AND RESPONSE SATIATION*British Journal of Psychology, 1963
- GrammaticalityWORD, 1961
- Some Methodological Remarks on Generative GrammarWORD, 1961