Feedback and Reflection
Top Cited Papers
- 1 December 2002
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Academic Medicine
- Vol. 77 (12, Part 1) , 1185-1188
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200212000-00005
Abstract
Feedback and reflection are two basic teaching methods used in clinical settings. In this article, the authors explore the distinctions between, and the potential impact of, feedback and reflection in clinical teaching. Feedback is the heart of medical education; different teaching encounters call for different types of feedback. Although most clinicians are familiar with the principles of giving feedback, many clinicians probably do not recognize the many opportunities presented to them for using feedback as a teaching tool. Reflection in medicine—the consideration of the larger context, the meaning, and the implications of an experience and action—allows the assimilation and reordering of concepts, skills, knowledge, and values into pre-existing knowledge structures. When used well, reflection will promote the growth of the individual. While feedback is not used often enough, reflection is probably used even less.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Vanquishing VirtueAcademic Medicine, 2001
- Supporting the moral development of medical studentsJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2000
- Teaching compassion and respectJournal of General Internal Medicine, 1999
- Attributes of Excellent Attending-Physician Role ModelsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1998
- Unethical and unprofessional conduct observed by residents during their first year of trainingAcademic Medicine, 1998
- Beyond curriculum reformAcademic Medicine, 1998
- Do clinical clerks suffer ethical erosion? Studentsʼ perceptions of their ethical environment and personal developmentAcademic Medicine, 1994
- Ethics in a short white coatAcademic Medicine, 1993
- A Pilot Study of Medical Student 'Abuse'JAMA, 1990
- Feedback in Clinical Medical EducationJAMA, 1983