In Response
- 1 June 1995
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Evaluation Practice
- Vol. 16 (2) , 179-199
- https://doi.org/10.1177/109821409501600207
Abstract
In Response to Dr. Daniel Stufflebeam's: Empowerment Evaluation, Objectivist Evaluation, and Evaluation Standards: Where the Future of Evaluation Should Not Go and Where It Needs to Go, October 1994, 321-338.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Need-based evaluation theory: What do you need to know to do good evaluation?Evaluation Practice, 1994
- Empowerment evaluation, objectivist evaluation, and evaluation standards: Where the future of evaluation should not go and where it needs to goEvaluation Practice, 1994
- Developmental evaluationEvaluation Practice, 1994
- Retrospective and prospective on program impact assessmentEvaluation Practice, 1994
- Summative evaluation, formative evaluation, and tactical researchEvaluation Practice, 1994
- Evaluation: Review of the past, preview of the futureEvaluation Practice, 1994
- Steps of empowerment evaluation: From California to Cape TownEvaluation and Program Planning, 1994
- Empowerment evaluationEvaluation Practice, 1994
- Naturalistic inquiryInternational Journal of Intercultural Relations, 1985
- Systematic EvaluationPublished by Springer Nature ,1985