VALIDITY GENERALIZATION: A REVIEW AND CRITIQUE OF THE CORRELATION MODEL
- 1 March 1984
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Personnel Psychology
- Vol. 37 (1) , 93-115
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1984.tb02249.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- PEARSON SELECTION FORMULAS: IMPLICATIONS FOR STUDIES OF PREDICTIVE BIAS AND ESTIMATES OF EDUCATIONAL EFFECTS IN SELECTED SAMPLESJournal of Educational Measurement, 1983
- Multiplicative validity generalization model: Accuracy of estimates as a function of sample size and mean, variance, and shape of distribution of true validities.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1982
- Progress in validity generalization: Comments on Callender and Osburn and further developments.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1982
- Another view of progress in validity generalization: Reply to Schmidt, Hunter, and Pearlman.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1982
- Validity Generalization and Situational Specificity: An Analysis of the Prediction of First—Year Grades in Law SchoolApplied Psychological Measurement, 1981
- Using Empirical Bayes Techniques in the Law School Validity StudiesJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1980
- Accuracy of Corrections for Restriction in Range Due to Explicit Selection in Heteroscedastic and Nonlinear DistributionsEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1980
- The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results.Psychological Bulletin, 1979
- An Empirical Study of the Accuracy of Corrections for Restriction in Range Due to Explicit SelectionApplied Psychological Measurement, 1979
- An Empirical Note on Correlation Coefficients Corrected for Restriction in RangeEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1971