Effects of hydration changes on bioelectrical impedance in endurance trained individuals
- 1 June 1998
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
- Vol. 30 (6) , 885-892
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00005768-199806000-00017
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine how differences in hydration states and ion content of hydrating fluids affected bioelectrical impedance (BI) and hydrostatic weighing (HW) measurements. Fifteen athletic subjects aged 19-56 yr were recruited. Relative body fat (%), fat-weight (FW), and fat-free weight (FFW) were assessed using BI and HW under normal conditions (N), hypohydration (HPO), rehydration (RHY), and superhydration (SHY) states. During the RHY and SHY trial periods, subjects were hydrated with either distilled water or an electrolyte solution (ELS). HPO and SHY levels were set at 3% of each person's normally hydrated body weight. Comparison between the distilled water and the ELS trials indicated that hydration solution had no effect on BI or HW. Thus, the results presented are the trial means of both hydration solutions combined. Both BI and HW were shown to be highly test-retest reliable (r-values: 0.96 and 0.99, respectively). The effects of exercise induced HPO followed by RHY on body composition values indicated that HW was very stable across measurement periods while BI was not. From N to the HPO state, BI %BF declined from 14.4 +/- 5.3% to 12.3 +/- 5.3%, respectively. After RHY, BIA %BF increased to 15.5 +/- 5.8%. Similar findings occurred when subjects were superhydrated (N-BI = 13.2 +/- 5.3%; SHY-BI = 15.4 +/- 5.6%). With a comparison of the intercepts and slopes of HW and BIA for the N and SHY states, it was clear hydration status significantly affected the intercepts (HW: 0.37 vs. BI: 1.85) and not the slopes (HW: 1.00 vs BI: 0.99). As a result, a majority of all fluid changes were interpreted as FW by BI. During HPO, 82% of the weight loss was considered FW while during RHY or SHY, 128% and 85% of the water weight regain/gain was considered FW. These results indicate that BI is not a valid technique in athletes, especially when wanting to determine body composition effects of training/detraining. This study indicates that even small fluid changes such as those that occur with endurance training may be interpreted incorrectly as changes in an athlete's body fat content.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Impact of2H and18O Pool Size Determinations on the Calculation of Total Energy ExpenditureObesity Research, 1995
- A comparison of measurements of lean body mass derived by bioelectrical impedance, skinfold thickness and total body potassium. A study in obese and non-obese normal subjectsScandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation, 1991
- The menstrual cycle’s effect on the reliability of bioimpedance measurements for assessing body compositionThe American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 1989
- Body composition changes assessed by bioelectrical impedance measurementsThe American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 1989
- Body composition analysis by bioelectrical impedanceMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 1988
- Electrical impedance in assessing human body composition: the BIA methodThe American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 1988
- Reliability and validity of bioelectrical impedance in determining body compositionJournal of Applied Physiology, 1988
- Methods for the assessment of human body composition: traditional and newThe American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 1987
- Validation of tetrapolar bioelectrical impedance method to assess human body compositionJournal of Applied Physiology, 1986
- Assessment of fat-free mass using bioelectrical impedance measurements of the human bodyThe American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 1985