Comparison of two skin care regimes for incontinence
- 1 March 2001
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Mark Allen Group in British Journal of Nursing
- Vol. 10 (Sup1) , S6-S20
- https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2001.10.sup1.5346
Abstract
It is estimated that 30% of nursing home residents may be faecally incontinent, with those figures rising to 60% for patients in long-stay hospitals (Royal College of Physicians, 1995). Maintaining skin integrity for these patients can be complex. With little clinical information to support carers, choosing a skin care regime that maintains skin integrity for this high-risk group can be difficult. This study aims to compare two recognized skin care regimes, used in the cleansing of patients' skin following an episode of incontinence, and their impact on patients' skin integrity. A total of 93 patients were recruited to the trial from five care of the elderly or dependent service providers. The subjects were randomly allocated to either group A (soap and water; n = 49), or group B (Clinisan (Vernacare); n = 44). Initially, 33 patients in both groups started with healthy skin. However, the results of the final assessment identified only 17 subjects in group A remaining healthy, compared with 27 in group B.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- The past politics of pressure sores.Journal of Tissue Viability, 1998
- Infant napkin dermatitisJournal of Wound Care, 1998
- Effects of Incontinence Care Cleansing Regimens on Skin IntegrityJournal of Wound, Ostomy & Continence Nursing, 1995
- Pressure sores and incontinence: a study evaluating the use of topical agents in skin careJournal of Wound Care, 1995
- PROTECTING THE SKIN from Moisture and Associated IrritantsJournal of Gerontological Nursing, 1994
- Towards a consensus: classification of pressure soresJournal of Wound Care, 1994
- Incontinence dermatitisPrimary Health Care, 1988