The affirmative character of U.S. cultural studies
- 1 June 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Critical Studies in Mass Communication
- Vol. 7 (2) , 169-184
- https://doi.org/10.1080/15295039009360171
Abstract
This article argues that, as imported to the United States from England by scholars like Lawrence Grossberg and John Fiske, cultural studies often loses much of its critical edge. Its misleading affirmation of the power and independence of media audiences derives from several problems. First, it overestimates the freedom of audiences in reception. Second, it minimizes the commodification of audiences as analyzed by a political‐economic approach. Third, it fails to differentiate between mass advertising and specialized media. Fourth, it confuses active reception with political activity. Finally, it takes the exceptional situation of progressive readings promoted within oppositional subcultures as the norm.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- The rhetorical limits of polysemyCritical Studies in Mass Communication, 1989
- Sitcoms and suburbs: Positioning the 1950s homemakerQuarterly Review of Film and Video, 1989
- The economy of desire: The commodity form in/of the cinemaQuarterly Review of Film and Video, 1989
- Media economics: Terms of analysisCritical Studies in Mass Communication, 1989
- Television: Polysemy and popularityCritical Studies in Mass Communication, 1986
- Signification, representation, ideology: Althusser and the post‐structuralist debatesCritical Studies in Mass Communication, 1985
- The Importance of Being Critical—in One's Own FashionJournal of Communication, 1983
- “Fantasy Island”: Marketplace of DesireJournal of Communication, 1983
- The Politics of Youth Culture: Some Observations on Rock and Roll in American CultureSocial Text, 1983
- Media sociologyTheory and Society, 1978