Leadership and Its Basis in Problems of Social Coordination
- 1 January 1992
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in International Political Science Review
- Vol. 13 (1) , 7-24
- https://doi.org/10.1177/019251219201300102
Abstract
Leadership is a means by which social groups attempt to realize gains from cooperation, coordination, and efficient allocation. The attempt to achieve such gains gives rise to further, overarching problems of coordination. The latter problems are recurrent but are likely to vary from one situation to the next; this makes decentralized methods of solution especially difficult, and provides the ultimate reason leadership is needed, invented, and accepted. Solution of such overarching problems makes leadership possible in the basic problems in which social gains are available, including activities such as organizing, sanctioning, communicating, and allocating. The stability of leadership is based on the group's need to solve coordination problems; as a result, a leader has discretion or "power," and can get away with less-than-maximal service of group goals. This approach to understanding leadership suggests several useful techniques for the study of political leadership in particular settings.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- The concept of powerBehavioral Science, 2007
- Learning How to Cooperate: Optimal Play in Repeated Coordination GamesEconometrica, 1990
- Cooperation by Design: Leadership, Structure, and Collective DilemmasAmerican Political Science Review, 1990
- A Theory of Political Control and Agency DiscretionAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1989
- Coordination Through Committees and MarketsThe RAND Journal of Economics, 1988
- Reputation and legislative leadershipPublic Choice, 1987
- Cheap Talk, Coordination, and EntryThe RAND Journal of Economics, 1987
- The Nash Bargaining Solution in Economic ModellingThe RAND Journal of Economics, 1986
- Comment on van de Kragt, Orbell, and Dawes (Vol. 77, March 1983, pp. 112-122)American Political Science Review, 1984
- Institutional Context and Leadership Style: The House from Cannon to RayburnAmerican Political Science Review, 1981