Bill Clinton's Approval Ratings: The More Things Change, The More They Stay the Same
- 1 December 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Political Research Quarterly
- Vol. 55 (4) , 781-804
- https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290205500403
Abstract
Over the past three decades, political scientists have been developing general models of presidential approval ratings, seeking to determine the structure of aggregate approval. This endeavor has culminated in the broad claim that “peace, prosperity, and probity” drive the public's approval. The unprecedented events of the Clinton Presidency, especially his high approval during and after impeachment, present a strong chal- lenge to this model. However, the existing model explains Clinton's approval remarkably well, suggesting that the public punished and rewarded him for the state of the economy, major political events, and his integrity. Passing this strong test constitutes considerable support for the existing model of approval.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Role of Character Assessments in Presidential ApprovalAmerican Politics Research, 2001
- Presidents and the Prospective VoterThe Journal of Politics, 1996
- Presidents and the Prospective Year: CommentThe Journal of Politics, 1996
- The Rise of Presidential Polling: The Nixon White House in Historical PerspectivePublic Opinion Quarterly, 1995
- Error Correction, Attitude Persistence, and Executive Rewards and Punishments: A Behavioral Theory of Presidential ApprovalPolitical Analysis, 1992
- Comparing Dynamic Specifications: The Case of Presidential ApprovalPolitical Analysis, 1991
- The Man in the Teflon Suit? The Environmental Connection, Political Drama, and Popular Support in the Reagan PresidencyPublic Opinion Quarterly, 1989
- The President's PublicAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1988
- Presidential Speechmaking and the Public Audience: Individual Presidents and Group AttitudesThe Journal of Politics, 1987
- Political Drama, Economic Conditions, and the Dynamics of Presidential PopularityAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1983