Cost-effectiveness of dilation and evacuation versus the induction of labor for second-trimester pregnancy termination
- 1 March 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Vol. 194 (3) , 768-773
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2005.09.003
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Accessibility of Abortion Services in the United States, 2001Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 2003
- A comparison of medical induction and dilation and evacuation for second-trimester abortionAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2002
- Misoprostol and PregnancyNew England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- A comparison of two dosing regimens of intravaginal misoprostol for second-trimester pregnancy terminationPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1999
- Unintended Pregnancy in the United StatesFamily Planning Perspectives, 1998
- A comparison of misoprostol with and without laminaria tents for induction of second-trimester abortionAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1996
- A Comparison of Intravaginal Misoprostol with Prostaglandin E2for Termination of Second-Trimester PregnancyNew England Journal of Medicine, 1994
- A five-year experience with second-trimester induced abortions: No increase in complication rate as compared to the first trimesterAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1993
- Midtrimester AbortionPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1984
- Mid-Trimester Abortion by Dilatation and EvacuationNew England Journal of Medicine, 1977