Analyzing the random control procedure: Effects of paired and unpaired CSs and USs on autoshaping the chick's key peck with heat reinforcement
- 1 November 1977
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Learning and Motivation
- Vol. 8 (4) , 467-487
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0023-9690(77)90046-7
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Signal-food contingency and signal frequency in a continuous trials auto-shaping paradigmLearning & Behavior, 1975
- Systematic manipulation of individual events in a truly random control in rats.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1975
- EFFECTS OF VARYING THE PERCENTAGE OF KEY ILLUMINATIONS PAIRED WITH FOOD IN A POSITIVE AUTOMAINTENANCE PROCEDURE1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1974
- CONTINGENCY SPACES AND MEASURES IN CLASSICAL AND INSTRUMENTAL CONDITIONING1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1974
- CONTROLS FOR AND CONSTRAINTS ON AUTO‐SHAPINGJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1973
- Two Types of Correlation between Reinforcement and the Elements of a Compound StimulusThe Psychological Record, 1973
- ASSOCIATIVE FACTORS UNDERLYING THE PIGEON'S KEY PECKING IN AUTO‐SHAPING PROCEDURES1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1973
- Factors affecting conditioning in the truly random control procedure in the rat.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1972
- Classical Conditioning of a Complex Skeletal ResponseScience, 1971
- Operationism and the Question "Is This Behavior Learned or Innate ?"Behaviour, 1961