Suppressing research data: Methods, context, accountability, and responses
- 1 July 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Accountability in Research
- Vol. 6 (4) , 333-372
- https://doi.org/10.1080/08989629908573935
Abstract
Research data can be suppressed in various ways, including organizational secrecy, defamation law and refusal to reply to queries. In a broader sense, methods of suppression include pressures not to do research in the first place and attacks on scientists who produce unwelcome data. The context of this sort of suppression includes individual self‐interest, vested interests, and paradigms. Suppressing research data can be either compatible with or contrary to accountability, depending on the constituencies involved. Ways to challenge suppression of research data include individual requests, exposés, refusal to suppress, publicity, creating new data, and social movements.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Suppression, bias, and selection in science: The case of cancer researchAccountability in Research, 1999
- The lost control and other mysteries: Further revelations on New Zealand's fluoridation trialAccountability in Research, 1999
- The toxicity/safety of processed free glutamic acid (MSG): A study in suppression of informationAccountability in Research, 1999
- Supping with a short spoon: Suppression inherent in research methodologyAccountability in Research, 1999
- Industry's privacy rights: Is science shortchanged?Chemical & Engineering News, 1998
- GLOBAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN INFORMATION: The story of TRIPS at the GATTPrometheus, 1995
- SCIENTIFIC FRAUD AND THE POWER STRUCTURE OF SCIENCEPrometheus, 1992
- FLAWED FOUNDATION: A RE‐EXAMINATION OF THE SCIENTIFIC BASIS FOR A DENTAL BENEFIT FROM FLUORIDATIONCommunity Health Studies, 1990
- Class, State, and Political Surveillance: Liberal Democracy and Structural ContradictionsInsurgent Sociologist, 1981
- Norms and Counter-Norms in a Select Group of the Apollo Moon Scientists: A Case Study of the Ambivalence of ScientistsAmerican Sociological Review, 1974