Jargon and Data Do Make a Difference:
- 1 April 1981
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Evaluation Review
- Vol. 5 (2) , 269-279
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841x8100500208
Abstract
Use of communication theory as a paradigmfor studing the impact of different evaluation report styles on different audiences was explored. Ratings of the evaluation consultant and the evaluation report were influenced by use of jargon and data, but, as in previous studies, were generally unrelated to whether they were read by lay or professional audiences. In contrast, extend of agreement with recommendations were related primarily to audience type and rarely related to the style of the report.Keywords
This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit:
- Communication theory and the utilization of evaluationNew Directions for Program Evaluation, 1980
- Evaluator Credibility as a Function of Report StyleEvaluation Quarterly, 1978
- The Credibility of a Local Educational Program Evaluation Report: Author Source and Client Audience CharacteristicsAmerican Educational Research Journal, 1978