Platelet scintigraphy results of heparin versus streptokinase treatment in acute deep vein thrombosis
- 1 January 2004
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal
- Vol. 38 (6) , 380-382
- https://doi.org/10.1080/14017430410016369
Abstract
The aim of the study was to document the therapeutic effects and primary recanalization ratios of either streptokinase or heparin in the therapeutic process of deep vein thrombosis (DVT). The results are obtained with the help of platelet scintigraphy. The investigation was planned as a randomized, controlled and prospective study, including 20 patients within two groups. Group I contained 10 patients undergoing IV infusion therapy of unfractionated heparin while Group II contained 10 patients undergoing thrombolytic therapy using streptokinase. After 8 weeks, scintigraphies using Tc-99m HMPAO-labeled thrombocytes were made, and interpreted by two blinded nuclear medicine physicians. The results are compared using Mann-Whitney U- and chi2-tests. No complication leading to interruption of therapy took place. Significantly smaller pathologic thrombocyte accumulations were detected in the streptokinase group. The difference was statistically significant (p = 0.019). Although a general clinical improvement had been observed in all patients, the scintigraphic investigation showed that the thrombolytic therapy maintained a better deep vein luminous patency.Keywords
This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit:
- Short- and long-term results after thrombolytic treatment of deep venous thrombosisJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2000
- A Comparison of Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin Administered Primarily at Home with Unfractionated Heparin Administered in the Hospital for Proximal Deep-Vein ThrombosisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- Treatment of Venous Thrombosis with Intravenous Unfractionated Heparin Administered in the Hospital as Compared with Subcutaneous Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin Administered at HomeNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996