Consider It Done? The Likely Efficacy Of Mandates For Health Insurance
- 1 November 2007
- journal article
- Published by Health Affairs (Project Hope) in Health Affairs
- Vol. 26 (6) , 1612-1621
- https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.26.6.1612
Abstract
Several health insurance reform plans, including the recently enacted Massachusetts plan, envision the use of individual or employer mandates to increase coverage rates. In this paper we summarize and analyze existing evidence on the effectiveness of mandates, drawing on evidence both from health insurance and from other arenas where mandates are often used. We find that mandates can, but do not always, increase participation in programs. The effectiveness of a mandate depends critically on the cost of compliance, the penalties for noncompliance, and the timely enforcement of compliance.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Associations of daycare and school entry vaccination requirements with varicella immunization ratesVaccine, 2005
- Single Mothers and Their Child-Support Receipt: How Well Is Child-Support Enforcement Doing?The Journal of Human Resources, 2004
- Profiles of Tax Non-Compliance among the Self-Employed in Canada: 1969 to 1992Canadian Public Policy, 2002
- SwitzerlandJournal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 2000
- Factors Affecting the Relative Incidence of Uninsured Motorists ClaimsJournal of Risk and Insurance, 2000
- The Expected Penalty for Committing a Crime: An Analysis of Minimum Wage ViolationsThe Journal of Human Resources, 1995
- Alternative Systems of Health Care ProvisionEconomic Policy, 1994
- Implementing Employer and Individual MandatesHealth Affairs, 1994
- I. STATE REPORT: Will Employer Mandates Really Work? Another Look At HawaiiHealth Affairs, 1994
- Compliance with the Minimum Wage LawJournal of Political Economy, 1979