Prediction of Organ-confined Prostate Cancer: Incremental Value of MR Imaging and MR Spectroscopic Imaging to Staging Nomograms
- 1 February 2006
- journal article
- Published by Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) in Radiology
- Vol. 238 (2) , 597-603
- https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2382041905
Abstract
Purpose: To assess retrospectively the incremental value of endorectal coil magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and combined endorectal MR imaging–MR spectroscopic imaging to the staging nomograms for predicting organ-confined prostate cancer (OCPC). Materials and Methods: The institutional review board approved this HIPAA-compliant study and issued a waiver of informed consent for review of the MR reports and clinical data. Between November 1, 1999, and November 1, 2004, 229 patients underwent endorectal MR imaging and 383 underwent combined endorectal MR imaging–MR spectroscopic imaging before radical prostatectomy. Mean patient age was 58 years (range, 32–74 years). MR studies were interpreted prospectively by 12 radiologists who were informed of patients' clinical data. On the basis of the MR reports, the risks of extracapsular extension, seminal vesicle invasion, and lymph node metastasis were scored retrospectively from 1 to 5; the highest score was subtracted from 6 to determine a score (from 1 to 5) for the likelihood of OCPC on MR studies. The staging nomograms were used to calculate the likelihood of OCPC on the basis of serum prostate-specific antigen level, Gleason grade at biopsy, and clinical stage. Histopathologic findings constituted the reference standard. Logistic regression was used to estimate the multivariable relations between OCPC and MR findings. The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve was calculated for each model. The jackknife method was used for bias correction. Results: MR findings contributed significant incremental value (P ≤ .02) to the nomograms in the overall study population. The contribution of MR findings was significant in all risk groups but was greatest in the intermediate- and high-risk groups (P < .01 for both). Accuracy in the prediction of OCPC with MR was higher when MR spectroscopic imaging was used, but the difference was not significant. Conclusion: Endorectal MR imaging and combined endorectal MR imaging–MR spectroscopic imaging contribute significant incremental value to the staging nomograms in predicting OCPC. © RSNA, 2005Keywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Organ-Confined Prostate Cancer: Effect of Prior Transrectal Biopsy on Endorectal MRI and MR Spectroscopic ImagingAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 2004
- The role of preoperative endorectal magnetic resonance imaging in the decision regarding whether to preserve or resect neurovascular bundles during radical retropubic prostatectomyCancer, 2004
- Comparison of Accuracy Between the Partin Tables Of 1997 and 2001 to Predict Final Pathological Stage in Clinically Localized Prostate CancerJournal of Urology, 2004
- Advances in imaging in the postoperative patient with a rising prostate-specific antigen levelSeminars in Oncology, 2003
- Management of High-Risk Populations with Locally Advanced Prostate CancerThe Oncologist, 2003
- Bladder Neck Involvement in Pathological Stage pT4 Radical Prostatectomy Specimens is Not An Independent Prognostic FactorJournal of Urology, 2002
- A VALIDATED STRATEGY FOR SIDE SPECIFIC PREDICTION OF ORGAN CONFINED PROSTATE CANCER: A TOOL TO SELECT FOR NERVE SPARING RADICAL PROSTATECTOMYJournal of Urology, 2001
- Improved water and lipid suppression for 3D PRESS CSI using rf band selective inversion with gradient dephasing (basing)Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 1997
- A Multivariate Analysis of Clinical and Pathological Factors that Predict for Prostate Specific Antigen Failure after Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate CancerJournal of Urology, 1995
- USEFULNESS OF DIGITAL RECTAL EXAMINATION, SERUM PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN, TRANSRECTAL ULTRAS ONOGRAPHY AND SYSTEMATIC PROSTATE BIOPSY FOR THE DETECTION OF ORGAN-CONFINED PROSTATE CANCERInternational Journal of Urology, 1995