Vivid Persuasion in the Courtroom
- 1 December 1985
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Personality Assessment
- Vol. 49 (6) , 659-664
- https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4906_16
Abstract
When witnesses at a trial offer testimony that is vivid, it may be more persuasive than the same testimony offered in a pallid manner. In this paper we elucidate three categories of variables (inferential, attentional/memorial, and affective) that are likely to mediate the effects of the vividness of testimony on jury judgments. These variables are then used to explain discrepant findings among mock juror experiments investigating vividness effects. Finally, we discuss the implications of vividness effects for the legal system.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Stalking the elusive "vividness" effect.Psychological Review, 1982
- Insensitivity to sample bias: Generalizing from atypical cases.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1980
- Judgmental biases resulting from differing availabilities of arguments.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1980
- Character proof and the fireside induction.Law and Human Behavior, 1979
- Cognitive bases of children's moral judgments.Developmental Psychology, 1977
- Comprehension and recall of abstract and concrete sentencesJournal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1976
- Attribution and the psychology of prediction.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975
- Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probabilityCognitive Psychology, 1973
- Concreteness and imagery in sentence meaningJournal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1969
- Assignment of responsibility for an accident.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1966