Closeness, Expenditures, and Turnout in the 1982 U.S. House Elections
- 1 March 1989
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in American Political Science Review
- Vol. 83 (1) , 217-231
- https://doi.org/10.2307/1956441
Abstract
Students of elections have repeatedly found that the closeness of an election is modestly correlated with turnout. This may be due to a direct response of instrumentally motivated voters, but recent theoretical work casts doubt on the adequacy of this explanation. Another possibility is that elite actors respond to closeness with greater effort at mobilization. We explore the latter possibility by using FEC and state data on campaign expenditures in House, Senate, and Gubernatorial races. Our results indicate that closeness has an effect at both the mass and elite levels. We also provide quantitative estimates of the effect of Senate and gubernatorial expenditure on House turnout.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Closeness and Turnout: a Methodological NoteThe Journal of Politics, 1988
- Residential Mobility and Voter TurnoutAmerican Political Science Review, 1987
- Your vote counts on account of the way it is counted: An institutional solution to the paradox of not votingPublic Choice, 1987
- The Informal Use of Formal ModelsAcademy of Management Review, 1984
- Voting as an act of contributionPublic Choice, 1981
- A note on political participation as consumption behaviorPublic Choice, 1977
- The Paradox of Not Voting: A Decision Theoretic AnalysisAmerican Political Science Review, 1974
- Reversals of preference between bids and choices in gambling decisions.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1971
- Canvassing, Turnout and Party Support: An ExperimentBritish Journal of Political Science, 1971
- Experimental Propaganda Techniques and Voting BehaviorAmerican Political Science Review, 1956