Evaluating and monitoring analgesia and sedation in the intensive care unit
Open Access
- 1 January 2008
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Nature in Critical Care
- Vol. 12 (Suppl 3) , S2
- https://doi.org/10.1186/cc6148
Abstract
Management of analgesia and sedation in the intensive care unit requires evaluation and monitoring of key parameters in order to detect and quantify pain and agitation, and to quantify sedation. The routine use of subjective scales for pain, agitation, and sedation promotes more effective management, including patient-focused titration of medications to specific end-points. The need for frequent measurement reflects the dynamic nature of pain, agitation, and sedation, which change constantly in critically ill patients. Further, close monitoring promotes repeated evaluation of response to therapy, thus helping to avoid over-sedation and to eliminate pain and agitation. Pain assessment tools include self-report (often using a numeric pain scale) for communicative patients and pain scales that incorporate observed behaviors and physiologic measures for noncommunicative patients. Some of these tools have undergone validity testing but more work is needed. Sedation-agitation scales can be used to identify and quantify agitation, and to grade the depth of sedation. Some scales incorporate a step-wise assessment of response to increasingly noxious stimuli and a brief assessment of cognition to define levels of consciousness; these tools can often be quickly performed and easily recalled. Many of the sedation-agitation scales have been extensively tested for inter-rater reliability and validated against a variety of parameters. Objective measurement of indicators of consciousness and brain function, such as with processed electroencephalography signals, holds considerable promise, but has not achieved widespread implementation. Further clarification of the roles of these tools, particularly within the context of patient safety, is needed, as is further technology development to eliminate artifacts and investigation to demonstrate added value.Keywords
This publication has 88 references indexed in Scilit:
- Sedation in the mechanically ventilated patientCritical Care Medicine, 2006
- Role of brain function monitoring in the critical care and perioperative settingsSeminars in Anesthesia, Perioperative Medicine and Pain, 2005
- Narcotrend Index Versus Bispectral Index as Electroencephalogram Measures of Anesthetic Drug Effect During Propofol AnesthesiaAnesthesia & Analgesia, 2004
- Adaptation to the Intensive Care Environment (ATICE): Development and validation of a new sedation assessment instrumentCritical Care Medicine, 2003
- National Survey of the Use of Sedating Drugs, Neuromuscular Blocking Agents, and Reversal Agents in the Intensive Care UnitJournal of Intensive Care Medicine, 2003
- Pain Assessment in Infants and Young Children: The Finger Span ScaleThe American Journal of Nursing, 2002
- How reliable is the Bispectral Index in critically ill patients? A prospective, comparative, single-blinded observer study*Critical Care Medicine, 2002
- Multidisciplinary Management of Sedation and Analgesia in Critical CareSeminars in Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2001
- Motor Activity Assessment ScaleCritical Care Medicine, 1999
- Practice parameters for intravenous analgesia and sedation for adult patients in the intensive care unitCritical Care Medicine, 1995