Cost Analyses of Adjunct Colony Stimulating Factors for Acute Leukemia: Can They Improve Clinical Decision Making
- 1 January 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Leukemia & Lymphoma
- Vol. 37 (1-2) , 65-70
- https://doi.org/10.3109/10428190009057629
Abstract
Colony stimulating factors reduce the duration of neutropenia following intensive chemotherapy in a variety of settings, but the advantages in the management of leukemia are inconclusive. The variations in clinical results and the high costs of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) have led to confusion over appropriate use for leukemia patients. In this paper, we reviewed published information on costs and cost-effectiveness of growth factors for childhood and adult leukemia patients. Medline and Healthstar databases were searched for original research articles that contain cost or cost-effectiveness analyses of G-CSF (filgrastim) and GM-SCF (sargra-mostim) in oncology cooperative group trials. Published manuscripts and abstracts presented at national or international oncology conferences were included. The cost of adjunct treatment was evaluated in two studies of pediatric ALL, one study of adult AML, and two studies of AML in older adults (>55 years). The use of G-CSF for children with ALL was associated with reductions in days to ANC recovery, fewer documented infections, a shorter duration of hospitalization, and small (but not significant) additional costs. In adult AML patients, benefits included a shortening of the duration of neutropenia and hospital stays, a lower incidence of infection and febrile episodes, less use of antibiotics, and cost savings of 2,230 and 2,310 in two studies and an increase if 120 in the third study. This summary suggests that economic analyses can provide useful information to assist clinical decision-making. For pediatric ALL patients, this information indicates that G-CSF use is unlikely to have significant cost implications, and its use should be based on clinical considerations. In studies of adult and older adult AML patients, both GM-CSF and G-CSF have clinical benefits and can be expected to lead to a decrease in overall costs.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial of Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor in Elderly Patients With Previously Untreated Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Southwest Oncology Group Study (9031)Blood, 1998
- A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase III Study of Filgrastim in Remission Induction and Consolidation Therapy for Adults With De Novo Acute Myeloid LeukemiaBlood, 1997
- Neutropenia and neoplasia: an overview of the pharmacoeconomics of sargramostim in cancer therapyClinical Therapeutics, 1997
- Human Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor after Induction Chemotherapy in Children with Acute Lymphoblastic LeukemiaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1997
- Incidence of Infections in Adult Patients (> 55 Years) with Acute Myeloid Leukemia Treated with Yeast-Derived GM-CSF (Sargramostim): Results of a Double-Blind Prospective Study by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology GroupPublished by Springer Nature ,1996
- Granulocyte–Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor after Initial Chemotherapy for Elderly Patients with Primary Acute Myelogenous LeukemiaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1995
- Intensive Postremission Chemotherapy in Adults with Acute Myeloid LeukemiaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1994
- Recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor after chemotherapy in patients with acute myeloid leukemia at higher age or after relapseBlood, 1991
- Effect of Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor after Intensive Induction Therapy in Relapsed or Refractory Acute LeukemiaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1990
- Quantitative Relationships Between Circulating Leukocytes and Infection in Patients with Acute LeukemiaAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1966