Efficacy of Establishment of Pneumoperitoneum with the Veress Needle, Hasson Trocar, and Modified Blunt Trocar (TrocDoc): A Randomized Study

Abstract
Purpose: To compare three techniques of establishment of pneumoperitoneum for efficacy: the Veress needle/first trocar, the Hasson trocar, and a newly developed modified blunt trocar, the TrocDoc. Patients and Methods: Between June and December 1999, 62 patients eligible for laparoscopic surgery were randomized. The effectiveness of installation of the pneumoperitoneum using the three techniques was assessed by time-motion analysis. Primary efficacy measures were total time and number of actions required to establish the pneumoperitoneum. Secondary efficacy measures were procedure-related complications, wound complications, and occurrence of CO2 leakage. Results: Two patients were withdrawn from inclusion. The three groups were comparable for age and body mass index. Total time was shortest using the TrocDoc rather than the Veress needle/first trocar and the Hasson trocar (respectively, 138 ± 58 v 237 ± 56 v 350 ± 103 seconds), and the number of actions was lowest for the Veress needle/first trocar combination: 22 ± 7 v 32 ± 12 (TrocDoc) v 53 ± 17 (Hasson). There was no morbidity related to the installation of pneumoperitoneum nor trocar wound complications. Gas leakage occurred in five of the Hasson introductions. Conclusions: Establishment of the pneumoperitoneum is more efficient using the TrocDoc compared with the Veress needle/first trocar and the Hasson trocar. The TrocDoc might replace the two alternatives because of its efficacy and open method of introduction.

This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit: