Handling of and Preferences for Available Dry Powder Inhaler Systems by Patients with Asthma and COPD
- 1 December 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Mary Ann Liebert Inc in Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery
- Vol. 21 (4) , 321-328
- https://doi.org/10.1089/jamp.2007.0634
Abstract
The correct handling of dry powder inhalers (DPIs) is crucial for efficient therapy, and acceptance of the device can improve compliance. The handling of seven different dry powder inhalers was studied in 72 patients with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The aim of this study was to identify possible handling errors and investigate patient preferences. Patients inhaled twice with each inhaler; first after reading the device leaflet, and second after device handling was explained by the investigator. The investigator identified handling errors and critical handling errors, which might lead to insufficient or no dose delivery. Afterward, the patients selected their preferred device and judged different aspects of device handling. The lowest number of patients with critical handling errors was observed for the Diskus/Accuhaler, the highest numbers for the Jethaler and the Easyhaler (% of patients during first/second use): Diskus/Accuhaler 25%/13.9% (group A) and 38.9%/8.3% (group B); Clickhaler 50.0%/52.8%, Cyclohaler 58.3%/13.9%, Jethaler 66.7%/30.6% (group A) and Benosid N Inhaler 52.8%/22.2%, Novolizer 52.8%/25.0%, Easyhaler 72.2%/47.2% (group B). Device handling improved after instruction by the investigator. Device handling and preferences of patients closely correlated in this study. Both devices producing the lowest numbers of handling errors (Diskus/Accuhaler and Clickhaler) had the highest preference by the subjects (score from 1 = very good to 7 = very bad): Diskus/Accuhaler 2.21 (group A) and 2.02 (group B); Clickhaler 2.21, Cyclohaler 2.80, Jethaler 3.16 (group A); Novolizer 2.33, Easyhaler 2.37, Benosid N Inhaler 2.43 (group B). Critical handling errors may reduce therapy outcome due to a reduced dose delivery. In addition, reduced patients acceptance of a device, being dependent on device handling, may have a similar effect by reducing patients' compliance.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- How to achieve good compliance and adherence with inhalation therapyCurrent Medical Research and Opinion, 2005
- Inhalative Therapie mit Dosier-Aerosolen: Fehleranalyse und Varianten der VerbesserungPneumologie, 2005
- Assessment of Handling of Inhaler Devices in Real Life: An Observational Study in 3811 Patients in Primary CareJournal of Aerosol Medicine, 2003
- Patient Perception and Acceptability of Multidose Dry Powder Inhalers: A Randomized Crossover Comparison of Diskus/Accuhaler with TurbuhalerJournal of Aerosol Medicine, 2002
- Patient Handling of a Dry-Powder Inhaler in Clinical PracticeChest, 2001
- SIMILAR EFFICACY FOLLOWING FOUR WEEKS TREATMENT OF ASTHMATICS WITH FORMOTEROL 12 μG B.D. DELIVERED BY TWO DIFFERENT DRY POWDER INHALERS: DIFFERENCES IN INHALER HANDLINGInternational Journal Of Clinical Practice, 2001
- COMPARISON OF EFFICACY AND EASE OF HANDLING OF SALMETEROL AND TERBUTALINE POWDER INHALERSInternational Journal Of Clinical Practice, 1998
- Patient Handling of a Multidose Dry Powder Inhalation Device for AlbuterolChest, 1994