Prognostic Significance of [18F]-Misonidazole Positron Emission Tomography–Detected Tumor Hypoxia in Patients With Advanced Head and Neck Cancer Randomly Assigned to Chemoradiation With or Without Tirapazamine: A Substudy of Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group Study 98.02
Top Cited Papers
- 1 May 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 24 (13) , 2098-2104
- https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2005.05.2878
Abstract
Purpose: To determine the association between tumor hypoxia, treatment regimen, and locoregional failure (LRF) in patients with stage III or IV squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck randomly assigned to radiotherapy (70 Gy in 35 fractions over 7 weeks) plus either tirapazamine and cisplatin in weeks 1, 4, and 7 and tirapazamine alone in weeks 2 and 3 (TPZ/CIS) or cisplatin and infusional fluorouracil during weeks 6 and 7 (chemoboost). Patients and Methods: Forty-five patients were enrolled onto a hypoxic imaging substudy of a larger randomized trial. Pretreatment and midtreatment [18F]-fluoromisonidazole positron emission tomography scans (FMISO-PET) were performed 2 hours after tracer administration, with qualitative scoring of uptake in both primary tumors and nodes. Results: Thirty-two patients (71%) had detectable hypoxia in either or both primary and nodal disease. In patients who received chemoboost, one of 10 patients without hypoxia had LRF compared with eight of 13 patients with hypoxia; the risk of LRF was significantly higher in hypoxic patients (exact log-rank, P = .038; hazard ratio [HR] = 7.1). By contrast, in patients who received the TPZ/CIS regimen, only one of 19 patients with hypoxic tumors had LRF; risk of LRF was significantly higher in chemoboost patients (P = .001; HR = 15). Similarly, looking at the primary site alone, in patients with hypoxic primaries, zero of eight patients treated with TPZ/CIS experienced failure locally compared with six of nine patients treated with chemoboost (P = .011; HR = 0). Conclusion: Hypoxia on FMISO-PET imaging, in patients receiving a nontirapazamine-containing chemoradiotherapy regimen, is associated with a high risk of LRF. Our data provide the first clinical evidence to support the experimental observation that tirapazamine acts by specifically targeting hypoxic tumor cells.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Tirapazamine, Cisplatin, and Radiation Versus Fluorouracil, Cisplatin, and Radiation in Patients With Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer: A Randomized Phase II Trial of the Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group (TROG 98.02)Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2005
- Strategies to overcome accelerated repopulation and hypoxia—what have we learned from clinical trials?Seminars in Oncology, 2004
- An Intergroup Phase III Comparison of Standard Radiation Therapy and Two Schedules of Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Patients With Unresectable Squamous Cell Head and Neck CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2003
- Phase I Trial of Concurrent Tirapazamine, Cisplatin, and Radiotherapy in Patients With Advanced Head and Neck CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2001
- Randomized Trial of Radiation Therapy Versus Concomitant Chemotherapy and Radiation Therapy for Advanced-Stage Oropharynx CarcinomaJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1999
- Hyperfractionated Irradiation with or without Concurrent Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Head and Neck CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1998
- Tumor hypoxia adversely affects the prognosis of carcinoma of the head and neckInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1997
- Pretreatment oxygenation predicts radiation response in advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neckRadiotherapy and Oncology, 1996
- Comparison of the enhancement of tumor responses to fractionated irradiation by SR 4233 (Tirapazamine) and by nicotinamide with carbogenInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1994
- The Concentration of Oxygen Dissolved in Tissues at the Time of Irradiation as a Factor in RadiotherapyThe British Journal of Radiology, 1953