Testifying on Eyewitness Reliability: Expert Advice Is Not Always Persuasive1
- 1 May 1985
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Applied Social Psychology
- Vol. 15 (3) , 207-229
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1985.tb00897.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Opinions of attorneys and law enforcement personnel on the accuracy of eyewitness identifications.Law and Human Behavior, 1983
- The ability of prospective jurors to estimate the accuracy of eyewitness identifications.Law and Human Behavior, 1983
- Do jurors share a common understanding concerning eyewitness behavior?Law and Human Behavior, 1982
- Impact of expert psychological testimony on the unreliability of eyewitness identification.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1980
- A comparison of three studies of the influence of expert testimony on jurors.Law and Human Behavior, 1980
- Influence of expert testimony regarding eyewitness accuracy on jury decisions.Law and Human Behavior, 1980
- Effects of purpose on the organization and recall of information in person perception1Journal of Personality, 1979
- Getting off a slippery slope: Social science in the judicial process.American Psychologist, 1979
- On The Use of Consensus: Prediction, Attribution and EvaluationPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1977
- Intuitive theories of events and the effects of base-rate information on prediction.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1977