Matching Optimal Pacemaker to Patient: Do We Need a Large Scale Clinical Trial of Pacemaker Mode Selection?
- 1 October 1995
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
- Vol. 18 (10) , 1845-1852
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.1995.tb03831.x
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 42 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cardiac pacing in Europe in 1992: a new surveyPublished by Springer Nature ,1994
- Rate-adaptive cardiac pacing: Cost versus technology versus patient benefitAmerican Heart Journal, 1993
- Does Dual Chamber or Atrial Pacing Prevent Atrial Fibrillation? The Need for a Randomized Controlled TrialPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1992
- Pacemaker hemodynamics: Clinical implicationsProgress in Cardiovascular Diseases, 1992
- The 1989 World Survey of Cardiac PacingPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1991
- Guidelines for implantation of cardiac pacemakers and antiarrhythmia devices. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Assessment of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Cardiovascular Procedures. (Committee on Pacemaker Implantation).Circulation, 1991
- The hemodynamic benefit of differential atrioventricular delay intervals for sensed and paced atrial events during physiologic pacingJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1989
- Importance of left atrial timing in the programming of dual-chamber pacemakersThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1987
- The Natural History of Sick Sinus SyndromePacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1986
- The Pacemaker SyndromeAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1985