Medical futility and the social context.
Open Access
- 1 June 1997
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in Journal of Medical Ethics
- Vol. 23 (3) , 148-153
- https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.23.3.148
Abstract
The concept of medical futility has come to be seen in some quarters as a value-neutral trump card when dealing with issues of power and conflicting values in medicine. I argue that this concept is potentially useful, but only in a social context that provides a normative framework for its use. This social context needs to include a broad consensus about the purpose of medicine and the nature of the physician-patient relationship.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Decisions to limit or continue life-sustaining treatment by critical care physicians in the United States: conflicts between physicians' practices and patients' wishes.American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 1995
- Beyond futility to an ethic of careThe American Journal of Medicine, 1994
- Futility in PracticeArchives of internal medicine (1960), 1993
- Physician Refusal of Requests for Futile or Ineffective InterventionsCambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 1992
- Medical Futility: Its Meaning and Ethical ImplicationsAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1990
- Do-Not-Resuscitate OrdersJAMA, 1988
- Do-not-resuscitate orders. Time for reappraisal in long-term-care institutionsJAMA, 1988
- Must We Always Use CPR?New England Journal of Medicine, 1987
- When Patients Request Specific InterventionsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1986
- Survival after Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in the HospitalNew England Journal of Medicine, 1983