Bias in methods for deriving standardized morbidity ratio and attributable fraction estimates
- 1 April 1984
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Statistics in Medicine
- Vol. 3 (2) , 131-141
- https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4780030206
Abstract
This paper examines several methods for deriving standardized morbidity ratios (SMR) and attributable fraction (attributable risk percentage) estimates. We show that some of the proposed methods will, in general, produce biased estimators, although the low variance of certain estimators sometimes compensates for their bias. A few methods are based on statistical fallacies and should be avoided, especially the method of deriving the expected number of cases from a regression equation that does not include the exposure under study.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Tests for interaction in epidemiologic studies: A review and a study of powerStatistics in Medicine, 1983
- Uses of ecologic analysis in epidemiologic research.American Journal of Public Health, 1982
- Interpretation and estimation of summary ratios under heterogeneityStatistics in Medicine, 1982
- Statistical methods for estimating attributable risk from retrospective dataStatistics in Medicine, 1982
- Multivariate estimation of exposure-specific incidence from case-control studiesJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1981
- Some insights into Miettinen's multivariate confounder score approach to case-control study analysis.Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 1979
- Calculation of Attributable Risks from Epidemiological DataInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 1978
- Coffee and Cardiovascular DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 1974