HLA genotyping in the international Type 1 Diabetes Genetics Consortium
Open Access
- 1 July 2010
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Clinical Trials
- Vol. 7 (1_suppl) , S75-S87
- https://doi.org/10.1177/1740774510373494
Abstract
Background Although human leukocyte antigen (HLA) DQ and DR loci appear to confer the strongest genetic risk for type 1 diabetes, more detailed information is required for other loci within the HLA region to understand causality and stratify additional risk factors. The Type 1 Diabetes Genetics Consortium (T1DGC) study design included high-resolution genotyping of HLA-A, B, C, DRB1, DQ, and DP loci in all affected sibling pair and trio families, and cases and controls, recruited from four networks worldwide, for analysis with clinical phenotypes and immunological markers. Purpose In this article, we present the operational strategy of training, classification, reporting, and quality control of HLA genotyping in four laboratories on three continents over nearly 5 years. Methods Methods to standardize HLA genotyping at eight loci included: central training and initial certification testing; the use of uniform reagents, protocols, instrumentation, and software versions; an automated data transfer; and the use of standardized nomenclature and allele databases. We implemented a rigorous and consistent quality control process, reinforced by repeated workshops, yearly meetings, and telephone conferences. Results A total of 15,246 samples have been HLA genotyped at eight loci to four-digit resolution; an additional 6797 samples have been HLA genotyped at two loci. The genotyping repeat rate decreased significantly over time, with an estimated unresolved Mendelian inconsistency rate of 0.21%. Annual quality control exercises tested 2192 genotypes (4384 alleles) and achieved 99.82% intra-laboratory and 99.68% inter-laboratory concordances. Limitations The chosen genotyping platform was unable to distinguish many allele combinations, which would require further multiple stepwise testing to resolve. For these combinations, a standard allele assignment was agreed upon, allowing further analysis if required. Conclusions High-resolution HLA genotyping can be performed in multiple laboratories using standard equipment, reagents, protocols, software, and communication to produce consistent and reproducible data with minimal systematic error. Many of the strategies used in this study are generally applicable to other large multi-center studies. Clinical Trials 2010; 7: S75—S87. http:// ctj.sagepub.comKeywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Biobanking, consent, and commercialization in international genetics research: the Type 1 Diabetes Genetics ConsortiumClinical Trials, 2010
- Designing and implementing sample and data collection for an international genetics study: the Type 1 Diabetes Genetics Consortium (T1DGC)Clinical Trials, 2010
- Collection and processing of whole blood for transformation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells and extraction of DNA: the Type 1 Diabetes Genetics ConsortiumClinical Trials, 2010
- Localization of type 1 diabetes susceptibility to the MHC class I genes HLA-B and HLA-ANature, 2007
- Going back to the roots: effective utilisation of HLA typing information for bone marrow registries requires full knowledge of the DNA sequences of the oligonucleotide reagents used in the testingTissue Antigens, 2000
- IMGT/HLA Database – a sequence database for the human major histocompatibility complexTissue Antigens, 2000
- The HLA class II locus DPB1 can influence susceptibility to type 1 diabetes.Diabetes, 2000
- Virtual DNA analysis as a platform for interlaboratory data exchange of HLA DNA typing resultsTissue Antigens, 1999
- PedCheck: A Program for Identification of Genotype Incompatibilities in Linkage AnalysisAmerican Journal of Human Genetics, 1998
- The role of HLA class II genes in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: molecular analysis of 180 Caucasian, multiplex families.1996