Influence of growth stage and season on the energy value of fresh herbage. 1. Changes in metabolizable energy content
- 1 June 1993
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Grass and Forage Science
- Vol. 48 (2) , 166-174
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.1993.tb01849.x
Abstract
The energy value and chemical composition of 70 herbages harvested over two years as either spring primary growths of increasing maturity (n= 32), summer regrowths (n= 14) or autumn regrowths of increasing maturity (n= 24) are reported. The herbages, which were dominated by perennial ryegrass, were harvested from commercial grassland on four sites in England in1986 (year 1) and 1987 (year 2). Digestibility and energy values were determined in vivo using wether sheep.In year 1, autumn regrowths had significantly (P < 0·05) lower neutral detergent fibre concentrationsthan summer regrowths, and lignin was lower (P < 0·05) in spring than in summer herbages. In year 2, autumn herbages had significantly(P < 0·05) higher concentrations of crude protein and hemicellulose than summer and autumn herbages. Spring herbages had higher concentrations of water‐soluble carbohydrates than summer (P 0·01) and autumn (P < 0·001) herbages.A higher (P < 0·05) metabolizable energy (ME) concentration was observed in spring compared with summer herbages in year 2 and in general there was considerably more variability in the values for the spring growths, ME content fell with increasing maturity in spring growths(0·046 and 0·035 MJ kg‐1 DM per day; years 1and 2 respectively) and this decline was 3–4 times faster than for autumn‐harvested material (0·012 and 0·017 MJ kg‐1 DM per day; years 1 and 2 respectively). In both years only immature spring herbages consistently produced ME contents in excess of 11·9 MJ kg‐1 DM.For 15 of the herbages the proportion of gross energy intake (GEI) lost as methane was measured directly using respiration chambers. The mean methane energy loss was 0·07 of GEI (range 0·057–0·082). A commonly used publish equation for predicting methane energy loss was shown not to be appropriate, although no relationships could be established between methane energy loss and either energy digestibility in vivo or chemical composition.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- The nutritive value of spring-grown herbage produced on farms throughout England and wales over four years. I. The effect of stage of maturity and other factors on chemical composition, apparent digestibility and energy values measured in vivoAnimal Feed Science and Technology, 1989
- Effect of forage species and season on nutrient digestion and supply in grazing cattleBritish Journal of Nutrition, 1986
- The digestion of fresh perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenneL. cv. Melle) and white clover (Trifolium repensL. cv. Blanca) by growing cattle fed indoorsBritish Journal of Nutrition, 1985
- The efficiency of utilization of metabolizable energy and apparent absorption of amino acids in sheep given spring- and autumn-harvested dried grassBritish Journal of Nutrition, 1985
- The digestion of spring and autumn harvested perennial ryegrass by sheepThe Journal of Agricultural Science, 1978
- The growth of young cattle fed on dried grass alone and with barley 1. Feed intake, digestibility and body gainsAnimal Science, 1971
- Comparison by direct animal calorimetry of the net energy values of an early and a late season growth of herbageAnimal Science, 1966
- Prediction of the amount of methane produced by ruminantsBritish Journal of Nutrition, 1965
- Evaluvation of artificially dried grass as a source of energy for sheep:II. The energy value of cocksfoot, timothy and two strains of rye-grass at varying stages of maturityThe Journal of Agricultural Science, 1964