Differences Between Left and Right Ventricular Chamber Geometry Affect Cardiac Vulnerability to Electric Shocks
- 22 July 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Circulation Research
- Vol. 97 (2) , 168-175
- https://doi.org/10.1161/01.res.0000174429.00987.17
Abstract
Although effects of shock strength and waveform on cardiac vulnerability to electric shocks have been extensively documented, the contribution of ventricular anatomy to shock-induced polarization and postshock propagation and thus, to shock outcome, has never been quantified; this is caused by lack of experimental methodology capable of mapping 3-D electrical activity. The goal of this study was to use optical imaging experiments and 3-D bidomain simulations to investigate the role of structural differences between left and right ventricles in vulnerability to electric shocks in rabbit hearts. The ventricles were paced apically, and uniform-field, truncated-exponential, monophasic shocks of reversed polarity were applied over a range of coupling intervals (CIs) in experiment and model. Experiments and simulations revealed that reversing the direction of externally-applied field (RV− or LV− shocks) alters the shape of the vulnerability area (VA), the 2-D grid encompassing episodes of arrhythmia induction. ...Keywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cardiac vulnerability to electric shocks during phase 1A of acute global ischemiaHeart Rhythm, 2004
- Averaging over depth during optical mapping of unipolar stimulationIEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 2002
- Concepts of ventricular defibrillationPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 2001
- The mechanisms of the vulnerable window: the role of virtual electrodes and shock polarityCanadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology, 2001
- Role of Structural Complexities of Septal Tissue in Maintaining Ventricular Fibrillation in Isolated, Perfused Canine VentricleJournal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 2001
- Success and Failure of the Defibrillation Shock:Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 2000
- Patterns of and mechanisms for shock-induced polarization in the heart: a bidomain analysisIEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 1999
- The role of cardiac tissue structure in defibrillationChaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, 1998
- Upper limit of vulnerability is a good estimator of shock strength associated with 90% probability of successful defibrillation in humans with transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillatorsJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1996
- Effects of pacing rate and timing of defibrillation shock on the relation between the defibrillation threshold and the upper limit of vulnerability in open chest dogsJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1991