Durability of the hancock MO bioprosthesis compared with standard aortic valve bioprostheses
Open Access
- 1 August 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
- Vol. 60, S221-S228
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4975(95)00253-h
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Ten-year experience with the porcine bioprosthetic valve: Interrelationship of valve survival and patient survival in 1,050 valve replacementsThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1990
- Fifteen-Year Experience with 1678 Hancock Porcine Bioprosthetic Heart Valve ReplacementsAnnals of Surgery, 1989
- The Hancock modified-orifice porcine bioprosthetic valve: 1976–1988The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1989
- The Porcine Bioprosthetic Heart Valve: Experience at 15 YearsThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1989
- Guidelines for Reporting Morbidity and Mortality after Cardiac Valvular OperationsThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1988
- Carpentier-Edwards Standard Porcine Bioprosthesis: Primary Tissue Failure (Structural Valve Deterioration) by Age GroupsThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1988
- Performance of the Hancock Porcine Bioprosthesis Following Aortic Valve Replacement: Considerations Based on a 15-Year ExperienceThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1988
- Comparative study of primary tissue failure between porcine (Hancock and Carpentier-Edwards) and bovine pericardial (Ionescu-Shiley) bioprostheses in the aortic position at five- to nine-year follow-upThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1988
- Aortic Valve Replacement with the Hancock Porcine XenograftThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1976
- Maximum utilization of the life table method in analyzing survivalJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1958