Cost-effectiveness of FDG-PET in staging non-small cell lung cancer: the PLUS study
- 29 May 2003
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Springer Nature in European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
- Vol. 30 (11) , 1444-1449
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-003-1199-9
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- The impact of fluorodeoxyglucose F 18 positron-emission tomography on the surgical staging of non–small cell lung cancerThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2002
- Solitary pulmonary nodules: accuracy and cost-effectiveness of sodium iodide FDG-PET using Australian dataEuropean Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 2002
- Effectiveness of positron emission tomography in the preoperative assessment of patients with suspected non-small-cell lung cancer: the PLUS multicentre randomised trialThe Lancet, 2002
- A Cost Analysis of Positron Emission TomographyAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 2001
- [Lung cancer in the Netherlands in the period 1989-1997: the epidemic is not over yet].2001
- Toward Less Futile Surgery in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer? A Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Cost-Effectiveness of Positron Emission TomographyControlled Clinical Trials, 2001
- Cost-effectiveness of FDG-PET for the management of solitary pulmonary nodules: a decision analysis based on cost reimbursement in Germany.European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 2000
- Preoperative Staging of Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer with Positron-Emission TomographyNew England Journal of Medicine, 2000
- Costs of F-18-FDG PET: Experience with a satellite conceptNuklearmedizin-Nuclear Medicine, 1998
- Decision tree sensitivity analysis for cost-effectiveness of FDG-PET in the staging and management of non-small-cell lung carcinoma.1996