Routine laparoscopic ultrasound can significantly reduce the need for selective intraoperative cholangiography during cholecystectomy
- 1 February 2007
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Surgical Endoscopy
- Vol. 21 (2) , 270-274
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0817-y
Abstract
The use of intraoperative cholangiography (IOC), routinely rather than selectively, during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is controversial. Recent findings have shown laparoscopic ultrasound (LUS) to be safe, quick, and effective not only for screening of the bile duct for stones, but also for evaluating the biliary anatomy. This study aimed to evaluate, on the basis of the LC outcome and the cost of LUS and IOC, whether and how much the routine use of LUS would be able to reduce the need for IOC. During LC, LUS was used routinely to screen the bile duct for stones and to evaluate the biliary anatomy, whereas IOC was used selectively only when LUS was unsatisfactory or unsuccessful. For 193 (96.5%) of 200 patients, LUS was completed successfully, whereas IOC was needed for 7 patients (3.5%). Bile duct stones were identified in 20 patients (10%). For the detection of bile duct stones, LUS yielded 19 true-positive, 175 true-negative, 0 false-positive, and 1 false-negative results. It had a sensitivity of 95%, a specificity of 100%, a positive predictive value of 100%, and a negative predictive value of 99.4%. The postoperative complications included bile leaks from the liver bed in two patients and a retained bile duct stone in one patient. If IOC had been used selectively in a traditional manner on the basis of preoperative risk factors, IOC would have been needed for 77 patients (38.5%). The total cost of LUS plus IOC for the current 200 patients was 26,256 dollars. The total estimated cost of selective IOC, if it had been performed for the 77 patients, would have been 31,416 dollars. Routine LUS accurately diagnosed bile duct stones and significantly reduced the need for selective IOC from a potential 38.5% to an actual 3.5% without adversely affecting the outcome of the LC or increasing the overall cost. The routine use of LUS during LC is accurate and cost effective.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Does routine intraoperative cholangiography prevent bile duct transection?Surgical Endoscopy, 2005
- Laparoscopic cholecystectomy without routine operative cholangiography does not result in significant problems related to retained stonesSurgical Endoscopy, 2002
- Laparoscopic intracorporeal ultrasound versus fluoroscopic intraoperative cholangiographySurgical Endoscopy, 2001
- Routine intraoperative Laparoscopic ultrasonography with selective cholangiography reduces bile duct complications during Laparoscopic cholecystectomyJournal of the American College of Surgeons, 2001
- Simple Laparoscopic Ultrasound Technique for Prevention of Bile Duct InjuriesJournal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques, 2000
- Vascular injuries within the hepatoduodenal ligamentSurgical Endoscopy, 2000
- Laparoscopic ultrasonography versus operative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: review of the literature and a comparison with open intraoperative ultrasonographyJournal of the American College of Surgeons, 1999
- Complications of Cholecystectomy: Risks of the Laparoscopic Approach and Protective Effects of Operative CholangiographyAnnals of Surgery, 1999
- Intraoperative Ultrasonography Versus Cholangiography During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Prospective Comparative StudyJournal of the American College of Surgeons, 1997
- Laparoscopic ultrasonography during cholecystectomyBritish Journal of Surgery, 1996