How is human cooperation different?
Top Cited Papers
- 12 September 2010
- journal article
- review article
- Published by The Royal Society in Philosophical Transactions Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences
- Vol. 365 (1553) , 2663-2674
- https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0157
Abstract
Although cooperation is a widespread phenomenon in nature, human cooperation exceeds that of all other species with regard to the scale and range of cooperative activities. Here we review and discuss differences between humans and non-humans in the strategies employed to maintain cooperation and control free-riders. We distinguish forms of cooperative behaviour based on their influence on the immediate payoffs of actor and recipient. If the actor has immediate costs and only the recipient obtains immediate benefits, we term this investment. If the behaviour has immediate positive effects for both actor and recipient, we call this a self-serving mutually beneficial behaviour or mutual cooperation. We argue that humans, in contrast to all other species, employ a wider range of enforcement mechanisms, which allow higher levels of cooperation to evolve and stabilize among unrelated individuals and in large groups. We also discuss proximate mechanisms underlying cooperative behaviour and focus on our experimental work with humans and our closest primate relatives. Differences in the proximate mechanisms also seem to contribute to explaining humans' greater ability to cooperate and enforce cooperation.Keywords
This publication has 137 references indexed in Scilit:
- Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) do not develop contingent reciprocity in an experimental taskAnimal Cognition, 2009
- Direct reciprocity with costly punishment: Generous tit-for-tat prevailsJournal of Theoretical Biology, 2008
- Cooperative problem solving in rooks ( Corvus frugilegus )Proceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2008
- Winners don’t punishNature, 2008
- Gossip as an alternative for direct observation in games of indirect reciprocityProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2007
- Human cooperation in social dilemmas: comparing the Snowdrift game with the Prisoner's DilemmaProceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2007
- Chimps don't just get mad, they get evenProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2007
- The limited impact of kinship on cooperation in wild chimpanzeesProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2007
- Cooperative problem solving in a cooperatively breeding primate (Saguinus oedipus)Animal Behaviour, 2004
- The genetical evolution of social behaviour. IIJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1964