Evaluating the Normal Approximation to the Binomial Test
- 1 June 1988
- journal article
- Published by American Educational Research Association (AERA) in Journal of Educational Statistics
- Vol. 13 (2) , 173-182
- https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986013002173
Abstract
The normal approximation to the binomial test with and without a continuity correction is evaluated in terms of control of Type I errors and power. The normal approximations are evaluated as robust for a given sample size, N, and at a given level α if the true Type I error rate never exceeds 1.5 α. The uncorrected normal test is found to be less robust than is implied by the currently applied guidelines. The most stringent currently used guideline of requiring σ2≥10 is adequate at α = .05 but must be increased to σ2 ≥35 at α = .01. The corrected test is shown to be robust but not conservative. Both tests are shown to have substantial power loss in comparison to the exact binomial test.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Type I Error Rates and Power Estimates of Selected Parametric and Nonparametric Tests of ScaleJournal of Educational Statistics, 1987
- Type I Error Rates and Power Estimates of Selected Parametric and Nonparametric Tests of ScaleJournal of Educational Statistics, 1987
- Applied StatisticsPublished by Springer Nature ,1984
- The Continuity Correction and Statistical TestingInternational Statistical Review, 1982
- Exact Type 1 Error Rates for Robustness of Student's t Test with Unequal VariancesJournal of Educational Statistics, 1980
- Exact Type 1 Error Rates for Robustness of Student's t Test with Unequal VariancesJournal of Educational Statistics, 1980
- Robustness?British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 1978
- Significance Tests in Discrete DistributionsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1961
- Some Methods for Strengthening the Common χ 2 TestsPublished by JSTOR ,1954