Volume and Outcome of Organ Transplantation
- 1 January 1992
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
- Vol. 8 (3) , 490-505
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266462300013775
Abstract
In general, technically demanding medical procedures are associated with better outcomes when they are carried out in institutions and by physicians with higher volumes of practice. This paper examines the evidence for a volume–outcome relationship in the case of organ transplantation. Although few studies have been done on this subject, existing evidence is consistent with improved outcomes at higher volumes. Therefore, evidence supports policies that regionalize transplantation services.Keywords
This publication has 46 references indexed in Scilit:
- Hospital Characteristics and Mortality RatesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1989
- Dealing with Limited ResourcesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988
- Medicare and Heart Transplants: Will Lightning Strike Twice?Health Affairs, 1988
- The influence of surgical specialty and caseload on the results of carotid endarterectomyJournal of Vascular Surgery, 1986
- RENAL TRANSPLANTATION IN THE UNITED KINGDOM AND IRELAND—THE CENTRE EFFECTThe Lancet, 1985
- The Quality of Life of Patients with End-Stage Renal DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 1985
- Relation between Surgical Volume and Incidence of Postoperative Wound InfectionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1981
- The Relation Between Surgical Volume and Mortality: An Exploration of Causal Factors and Alternative ModelsMedical Care, 1980
- Should Operations Be Regionalized?New England Journal of Medicine, 1979
- The Complications of Coronary ArteriographyCirculation, 1973