Sex and Racial Differences in the Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction, 1994 through 2002
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 18 August 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 353 (7) , 671-682
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmsa032214
Abstract
Although increased attention has been paid to sex and racial differences in the management of myocardial infarction, it is unknown whether these differences have narrowed over time. With the use of data from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction, we examined sex and racial differences in the treatment of patients who were deemed to be “ideal candidates” for particular treatments and in deaths among 598,911 patients hospitalized with myocardial infarction between 1994 and 2002. In the unadjusted analysis, sex and racial differences were observed for rates of reperfusion therapy (for white men, white women, black men, and black women: 86.5, 83.3, 80.4, and 77.8 percent, respectively; P<0.001), use of aspirin (84.4, 78.7, 83.7, and 78.4 percent, respectively; P<0.001), use of beta-blockers (66.6, 62.9, 67.8, and 64.5 percent; P<0.001), and coronary angiography (69.1, 55.9, 64.0, and 55.0 percent; P<0.001). After multivariable adjustment, racial and sex differences persisted for rates of reperfusion therapy (risk ratio for white women, black men, and black women: 0.97, 0.91, and 0.89, respectively, as compared with white men) and coronary angiography (relative risk, 0.91, 0.82, and 0.76) but were attenuated for the use of aspirin (risk ratio, 0.97, 0.98, and 0.94) and beta-blockers (risk ratio, 0.98, 1.00, and 0.96); all risks were unchanged over time. Adjusted in-hospital mortality was similar among white women (risk ratio, 1.05; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.03 to 1.07) and black men (risk ratio, 0.95; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.89 to 1.00), as compared with white men, but was higher among black women (risk ratio, 1.11; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.06 to 1.16) and was unchanged over time. Rates of reperfusion therapy, coronary angiography, and in-hospital death after myocardial infarction, but not the use of aspirin and beta-blockers, vary according to race and sex, with no evidence that the differences have narrowed in recent years.Keywords
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- Race and Gender Disparities in Rates of Cardiac RevascularizationMedical Care, 2003
- Comparison of presentation, treatment, and outcome of acute myocardial infarction in men versus women (the Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention Registry)The American Journal of Cardiology, 1996
- Influence of race, sex, and age on management of unstable angina and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction: The TIMI III registryJAMA, 1996
- Adherence to national guidelines for drug treatment of suspected acute myocardial infarction: evidence for undertreatment in women and the elderlyArchives of internal medicine (1960), 1996
- Gender differences and factors associated with the receipt of thrombolytic therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction: A community-wide perspectiveAmerican Heart Journal, 1996
- Race and sex differences in rates of invasive cardiac procedures in US hospitals. Data from the National Hospital Discharge SurveyArchives of internal medicine (1960), 1995
- Racial variation in cardiac procedure use and survival following acute myocardial infarction in the Department of Veterans AffairsJAMA, 1994
- Racial Differences in the Use of Invasive Cardiovascular Procedures in the Department of Veterans Affairs Medical SystemNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993
- Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute myocardial infarctionJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1990
- Racial inequalities in the use of procedures for patients with ischemic heart disease in MassachusettsJAMA, 1989