Brain-damage and the spiral aftereffect: A Review
- 1 December 1973
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Australian Journal of Psychology
- Vol. 25 (3) , 251-257
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00049537308255852
Abstract
Data are reviewed suggesting that attentional and response factors are at the basis of the reduced susceptibility of organic Ss to the spiral aftereffect reported in many studies. In particular, organic Ss demonstrate an impaired aftereffect to the extent they are unable to maintain fixation during exposure to moving contours and are unwilling to report atypical perceptual phenomena. These variables are difficult to standardize in the clinical testing situation. Attentional and response factors merit study in their own right, and they may have greater diagnostic validity than the aftereffect measure itself.Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Size constancy in mental retardates and normals: A signal-detectability analysis.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1971
- Persistence of the waterfall illusion after-effect as a test of brain damage.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1966
- Some stimulus dimensions of rotating spirals.Psychological Review, 1965
- Measurement of a Visual Motion Aftereffect in the Rhesus MonkeyScience, 1963
- Psychophysical Measurement of the Spiral After-EffectThe American Journal of Psychology, 1962
- Judgements and the effects of instructionsActa Psychologica, 1961
- The Spiral After-Effect As a Test of Brain DamageJournal of Mental Science, 1958
- The spiral after-effect in a neurological setting.Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1958
- Further evaluation of the Archimedes Spiral Aftereffect.Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1958
- NEURAL SATIATION IN THE SPIRAL AFTEREFFECT AND SIMILAR MOVEMENT AFTEREFFECTSPublished by SAGE Publications ,1958