A Framework for Epistemological Analysis in Empirical (Laboratory and Field) Studies
- 1 March 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
- Vol. 42 (1) , 87-101
- https://doi.org/10.1518/001872000779656642
Abstract
In their search for generalizable behavioral patterns and design principles, cognitive field researchers should reflect on the epistemological limitations of empirical studies. In this paper we describe a framework for epistemological analysis that can help serve this purpose and discuss its application to two prototypical cases of cognitive engineering research: laboratory experiments and field studies. The framework examines two, often implicit, processes in empirical research: the abstraction from empirical data and the substantiation of theoretical constructs and principles. By explicitly considering these two processes in several systematic steps, we can gain appreciation for the epistemological contribution of empirical studies to cognitive engineering research. The framework and its application also provide guidance to such important issues as generalizability of results and external validity. Possible applications of this research include providing guidance to researchers and practitioners in evaluating design principles or conducting field studies.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Optimal Performance Engineering: Good, Better, BestHuman Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1993
- Cognitive modelling of fighter aircraft process control: a step towards an intelligent on-board assistance systemInternational Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 1992
- The bankruptcy of everyday memory.American Psychologist, 1989
- Some Generalizations about GeneralizationHuman Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1988
- Generalization in Operational Contexts: What Does It Mean? Can It be Done?IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 1986
- External validity is more than skin deep: Some answers to criticisms of laboratory experiments.American Psychologist, 1982
- The purposes of laboratory experimentation and the virtues of deliberate artificialityJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1980
- Research settings in industrial and organizational psychology: Are findings in the field more generalizable than in the laboratory?American Psychologist, 1979
- The Relevance of Laboratory Studies to Practical SituationsErgonomics, 1967
- Perception and the Representative Design of Psychological ExperimentsPublished by University of California Press ,1956