Controlled Clinical Comparison of BacT/ALERT Standard Aerobic Medium with BACTEC Standard Aerobic Medium for Culturing Blood
Open Access
- 1 June 2003
- journal article
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Journal of Clinical Microbiology
- Vol. 41 (6) , 2391-2394
- https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.41.6.2391-2394.2003
Abstract
Standard aerobic media are widely used for culturing blood with the BacT/ALERT (BioMérieux, Inc., Durham, N.C.) (BM) and BACTEC 9240 (BD Diagnostic Systems, Sparks, Md.) (BD) automated continuously monitoring instrument systems. Although similarly composed of soybean-casein digest broths, the formulations of the standard aerobic media available for these instruments differ from each other in supplements and in sodium polyanetholesulfonate concentration. Therefore, we compared the standard aerobic media available for these systems at two university hospitals. Blood samples from adult patients with suspected bloodstream infection were inoculated at the bedside into nonvented BM and BD standard aerobic blood culture bottles and incubated in their respective instruments. The laboratories received 6,743 pairs of bottles that were each filled with 8 to 12 ml of blood. A total of 523 isolates representing true infections were recovered from 257 patients; of these isolates, 348 were recovered from both the BD and the BM bottles, 108 were recovered from the BM bottles only, and 67 were recovered from the BD bottles only ( P < 0.005). More staphylococci ( P < 0.05), especially coagulase-negative staphylococci ( P < 0.05), and yeasts ( P < 0.01) were recovered from BM bottles than from BD bottles. Of 291 unimicrobial episodes of bloodstream infection, 220 were detected with both bottles, 41 were detected with the BM bottles only, and 30 were detected with the BD bottles only (difference not significant). Among 335 cultures that were positive in both bottles within the first 72 h of incubation, the median times to detection were 14 h for BM bottles and 13 h for BD bottles. Rates for false-positive results were 0.5% for BM bottles and 0.1% for BD bottles. One BM bottle and seven BD bottles yielded false-negative results. We conclude that the BM medium provides improved recovery of microorganisms, especially staphylococci and yeasts, compared with that provided by the BD medium.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Clinical Significance of Positive Blood Cultures in the 1990s: A Prospective Comprehensive Evaluation of the Microbiology, Epidemiology, and Outcome of Bacteremia and Fungemia in AdultsClinical Infectious Diseases, 1997
- Clinical comparison of the isolator and BacT/Alert aerobic blood culture systemsJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 1995
- Controlled evaluation of BacT/Alert standard aerobic and FAN aerobic blood culture bottles for detection of bacteremia and fungemiaJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 1995
- Controlled evaluation of 5 versus 10 milliliters of blood cultured in aerobic BacT/Alert blood culture bottlesJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 1994
- Comparison of Difco ESP and Organon Teknika BacT/Alert continuous-monitoring blood culture systemsJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 1994
- Controlled comparison of the BacT/Alert and BACTEC 660/730 nonradiometric blood culture systems.1992
- Controlled comparison of the BacT/Alert and BACTEC 660/730 nonradiometric blood culture systemsJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 1992
- The Clinical Significance of Positive Blood Cultures: A Comprehensive Analysis of 500 Episodes of Bacteremia and Fungemia in Adults. I. Laboratory and Epidemiologic ObservationsClinical Infectious Diseases, 1983