Comparison of tri-iodoisophthaldiamide with meglumine lothalamate in phlebography of the leg
- 1 April 1982
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Roentgen Ray Society in American Journal of Roentgenology
- Vol. 138 (4) , 725-727
- https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.138.4.725
Abstract
One hundred patients were examined by ascending phlebography of both legs in a prospective, double-blind, within-patient study. Each leg was randomly allocated to the examination using either lopamidol 61% as the contrast medium. Immediate side effects were recorded in all patients, and delayed effects in 46 patients. Statistical analysis using the chi-square test showed that lopamidol produced significantly less immediate and delayed pain in the foot and the leg than Conray. Iopamidol produced significantly less nausea and vomiting during the injection than Conray. There was no significant difference in the quality of the phlebograms with either of contrast medium.This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit:
- Osmolality of intravascular radiological contrast mediaThe British Journal of Radiology, 1980
- 125I-fibrinogen uptake following phlebography of the leg. Comparison of ionic and nonionic contrast media.Radiology, 1980
- Leg Phlebography: The Incidence, Nature and Modification of Undesirable Side EffectsRadiology, 1977