5‐Year Evaluation of Durapatite Ceramic Alloplastic Implants in Periodontal Osseous Defects
- 1 October 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in The Journal of Periodontology
- Vol. 60 (10) , 544-551
- https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1989.60.10.544
Abstract
Six patients who participated in a clinical study comparing the response of periodontal osseous defects to either grafting with Periograf (durapatite) hydroxylapatite (HA) ceramic or debridement alone (DEBR) were followed under an active maintenance program for 5 years. Mean values for gingival recession and attachment levels remained essentially stable following either treatment over the 5 year period. However, mean probeable pocket depths shifted from being significantly (P < 0.05) shallower for DEBR sites at 6 months and 1 year to being significantly shallower for HA sites at 5 years. The probing pocket depth change for grafted sites was steady and the change from presurgical values was significantly greater than the change for DEBR areas, which became about 1.5 mm deeper over the 5 year postsurgical period. Intrapatient comparisons showed that recession, attachment gain, and pocket depth decrease were most frequently greater for the Periograf-treated sites. Assessment of the pattern of clinical changes during the 5 year postsurgical period demonstrated that the attachment level of grafted sites improved or stayed the same 86% of the time compared to only 62% stability or improvement in the DEBR only sites. In fact, 38% of the DEBR sites were worse at 5 years than at the time of surgery, a 3 times greater failure rate than that found in the HA-grafted sites. Pocket depth measurements showed that 98% of the Periograf-treated sites were better or the same as presurgically (2% worse), while only 80% of DEBR sites showed positive results and 20% had deeper pockets than at the time of surgery. These findings suggest that Periograf–treated sites were stable for 5 years following surgery and resulted in a high frequency of clinical improvement, while areas treated by open flap debridement alone were not stable and regressed at a rate 3 to 5 times that of the grafted sites. It is probable that other grafting materials would demonstrate similar comparative results to debridement alone. (J Periodontol 1989;60:544–551)Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Use of a Porous Hydroxylapatite Implant in Periodontal DefectsThe Journal of Periodontology, 1985
- Longitudinal Evaluation of Durapatite Ceramic as an Alloplastic Implant in Periodontal Osseous Defects after 3 YearsThe Journal of Periodontology, 1984
- Long‐term maintenance of patients treated for advanced periodontal disease*Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 1984
- Comparison of surgical and nonsurgical treatment of periodontal disease A review of current studies and additional results after 6 1/2 yearsJournal of Clinical Periodontology, 1983
- Healing Responses of Human Intraosseous Lesions Following the Use of Debridement, Grafting and Citric Acid Root Treatment: II. Clinical and Histologic Observations: One Year PostsurgeryThe Journal of Periodontology, 1983
- Significance of frequency of professional tooth cleaning for healing following periodontal surgeryJournal of Clinical Periodontology, 1983
- Clinical and radiographic long-term study of teeth with periodontal destruction treated by a modified flap operationJournal of Clinical Periodontology, 1981
- Effect of controlled oral hygiene procedures on caries and periodontal disease in adultsJournal of Clinical Periodontology, 1981
- A Long‐Term Survey of Tooth Loss in 600 Treated Periodontal PatientsThe Journal of Periodontology, 1978
- An Evaluation of the Navy Periodontal Screening ExaminationThe Journal of Periodontology, 1977