An evaluation of length and end-phrase of visual analogue scales in dental pain
- 1 February 1985
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Pain
- Vol. 21 (2) , 177-185
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(85)90287-8
Abstract
Visual analog scales (VAS) of different lengths (5, 10, 15 and 20 cm) and with different end-phases (troublesome, miserable, intense, unbearable and worst pain imaginable) were used to record pain in 50 male and 50 female patients with pulpitis or pericoronitis. All 100 patients successfully completed the questionnaire. High correlation was found between the scores on all the scales. Scales of length 10 or 15 cm had the smallest measurement error. The scale with the end-phrase worst pain imaginable was the best choice for comparing present pain or worst pain between different groups. Using this scale no significant difference was found between the scores of males and females or between those of patients with pulpitis and pericoronitis. This study suggests the use of 10 cm visual analog scales with the end-phrase worst pain imaginable as being the most suitable for measuring dental pain.This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- The clinical assessment of analgesic drugs.Published by Wiley ,1981
- Measurement of pain: Patient preference does not confound pain measurementPain, 1981
- Clinical evaluation of mild analgesics.British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 1980
- Studies with pain rating scales.Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 1978
- The McGill Pain Questionnaire: Major properties and scoring methodsPain, 1975
- Comparison of fixed interval and visual analogue scales for rating chronic painEuropean Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 1975
- MEASUREMENT OF PAINPublished by Elsevier ,1974
- On the Language of PainAnesthesiology, 1971
- A Growing Edge of Measurement of Feelings [Abridged]Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine, 1969
- The Graphic Rating Scale.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1923