QTL Mapping Under Ascertainment
- 16 May 2006
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Annals of Human Genetics
- Vol. 70 (6) , 867-881
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-1809.2006.00286.x
Abstract
Mapping quantitative trait loci (QTL) using ascertained sibships is discussed. It is shown that under the standard normality assumption of variance components analysis the efficient scores are unchanged by ascertainment, and two different schemes of ascertainment correction suggested in the literature are asymptotically equivalent. The use of conditional maximum likelihood estimators derived under the normality assumption to estimate nuisance parameters is shown to result in only a small loss of power compared to the case of known parameters, even when the distribution of phenotypes is non-normal and/or the ascertainment criterion is ill defined.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Genome scans with gene‐covariate interactionGenetic Epidemiology, 2005
- Mapping quantitative traits with random and with ascertained sibshipsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2004
- Powerful Regression-Based Quantitative-Trait Linkage Analysis of General PedigreesAmerican Journal of Human Genetics, 2002
- Mapping multiple genes for quantitative or complex traitsGenetic Epidemiology, 2002
- Mapping quantitative trait loci in oligogenic modelsBiostatistics, 2001
- Ascertainment issues in variance components modelsGenetic Epidemiology, 2000
- Methods to estimate genetic components of variance for quantitative traits in family studiesGenetic Epidemiology, 1999
- A resolution of the ascertainment sampling problem: IV. Continuous phenotypesGenetic Epidemiology, 1988
- Robust inference for variance components models in families ascertained through probands: I. Conditioning on proband's phenotypeGenetic Epidemiology, 1987
- Theoretical StatisticsPublished by Springer Nature ,1974