Comparison between two strategies for umbilical cord blood collection
- 1 February 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Bone Marrow Transplantation
- Vol. 31 (4) , 269-273
- https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1703809
Abstract
The use of cord blood (CB) for transplantation has increased greatly in recent years. The collection strategy is the first step in collecting good-quality CB units. There are two main techniques for collecting CB from the umbilical vein: in the delivery room while the placenta is still in the uterus by midwives and obstetricians or in an adjacent room after placental delivery by CB bank trained personnel. In this study, the benefits and disadvantages between the two different CB collection strategies were evaluated, in order to improve CB bank methodology. Valencia CB bank maintains the two different collection strategies. CB was obtained from 569 vaginal and 70 caesarean deliveries and obstetrical and clinical charts were reviewed. Before processing CB units, volume was calculated and samples were drawn for cell counts. After processing and before cryopreservation samples were drawn for cell counts, CD34+cell analysis, viability, clonogenic assays and microbiology were drawn directly from the bags. We compared the efficiency of the two collection techniques. Obstetric data and umbilical CB were obtained from 569 vaginal (264 collected in utero and 305 collected ex utero) and 70 caesarean deliveries. The proportion of excluded CB units before processing was 33% for vaginal ex utero, 25% for vaginal in utero and 46% for caesarean deliveries. Differences were statistically significant. For vaginal deliveries a larger volume and a higher number of nucleated cells, percentage of CD34+ cells and colony-forming units (CFUs) were harvested in the in utero collection group. There was no statistical difference between CB collected after placental expulsion from vaginal and caesarean deliveries. Comparison between all vaginal and caesarean deliveries did not show any difference. We conclude that the mode of collection influences the haematopoietic content of CB donations. Collection before placental delivery is the best approach to CB collection and allows optimisation of CB bank methodology. Caesarean deliveries seem to contain similar progenitor content to vaginal deliveries.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Influence of mode of birth and collection on WBC yields of umbilical cord blood unitsTransfusion, 2002
- An international survey of unrelated umbilical cord blood bankingVox Sanguinis, 2001
- Cord blood collection before and after placental delivery: levels of nucleated cells, haematopoietic progenitor cells, leukocyte subpopulations and macroscopic clotsBone Marrow Transplantation, 2001
- Bigger is better: maternal and neonatal predictors of hematopoietic potential of umbilical cord blood unitsBone Marrow Transplantation, 2001
- Association of stress during delivery with increased numbers of nucleated cells and hematopoietic progenitor cells in umbilical cord bloodAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2000
- Factors affecting the volume of umbilical cord blood collectionsActa Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 2000
- Umbilical cord blood collection before placental delivery during cesarean delivery increases cord blood volume and nucleated cell number available for transplantationAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2000
- The number of nucleated cells reflects the hematopoietic content of umbilical cord blood for transplantationBone Marrow Transplantation, 1999
- Optimizing cord blood mononuclear cell yield: a randomized comparison of collection before vs after placenta deliveryBone Marrow Transplantation, 1998
- Hematopoietic Reconstitution in a Patient with Fanconi's Anemia by Means of Umbilical-Cord Blood from an HLA-Identical SiblingNew England Journal of Medicine, 1989