The effect of relatedness on likelihood ratios and the use of conservative estimates
- 1 June 1995
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Genetica
- Vol. 96 (1) , 13-19
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01441147
Abstract
DNA profiling can be used to identify criminals through their DNA matching that left at the scene of a crime. The strength of the evidence supplied by a match in DNA profiles is given by the likelihood ratio. This, in turn, depends upon the probability that a match would be produced if the suspect is innocent. This probability could be strongly affected by the possibility of relatedness between the suspect and the true source of the scene-of-crime DNA profile. Methods are shown that allow for the possibility of such relatedness, arising either through population substructure or through a family relationship. Uncertainties about the likelihood ratio have been taken as grounds for the use of very conservative estimates of this quantity. The use of such conservative estimates can be shown to be neither necessary nor harmless.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- The effect of relatives on the likelihood ratio associated with DNA profile evidence in criminal casesJournal of the Forensic Science Society, 1994
- How convincing is DNA evidence?Nature, 1994
- The forensic significance of various reference population databases for estimating the rarity of variable number of tandem repeat (VNTR) loci profilesPublished by Springer Nature ,1993
- The effect of population subdivision on estimates of the likelihood ratio in criminal cases using single-locus DNA probesHeredity, 1992
- Evaluating DNA profiles in a case where the defence is “It was my brother”Journal of the Forensic Science Society, 1992
- Population Genetics in Forensic DNA TypingScience, 1991
- The Utility of DNA Typing in Forensic WorkScience, 1991
- Positive identification of an immigration test-case using human DNA fingerprintsNature, 1985
- Individual-specific ‘fingerprints’ of human DNANature, 1985
- Hypervariable ‘minisatellite’ regions in human DNANature, 1985