Paradigms in conflict: the strategist, the conflict researcher and the peace researcher
- 1 April 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Review of International Studies
- Vol. 14 (2) , 97-115
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0260210500113336
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to compare three approaches to conflict, those of the ‘strategist’, the ‘conflict researcher’ and the ‘peace researcher’. Strategic studies, our starting point, are usually seen exclusively within the framework of power politics and the manipulation of threat systems. This approach to conflict is clearly of great importance, especially as it is the one most frequently adopted by decision-makers. It is not, however, the only possible approach, and the lineage of each of the three approaches can be traced back to antiquity.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Injustice, empowerment, and facilitation in conflictInternational Interactions, 1987
- Nuclear strategy and political theory: a critical assessmentReview of International Studies, 1985
- The Dialectics of World Order: Notes for a Future Archeologist of International Savoir FaireInternational Studies Quarterly, 1984
- Peace Research: The Cult of PowerJournal of Conflict Resolution, 1972
- Peace Research and PoliticsJournal of Peace Research, 1968