What Clinicians Should Know About the QT Interval
Top Cited Papers
- 23 April 2003
- journal article
- review article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in JAMA
- Vol. 289 (16) , 2120-2127
- https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.289.16.2120
Abstract
Research from JAMA — What Clinicians Should Know About the QT Interval — ContextOf the several factors implicated in causing QT interval prolongation and torsades de pointes, errors in the use of medications that may prolong this interval deserve special attention.ObjectiveTo systematically summarize the available clinical data on the QT interval and to offer improved recommendations for the use of QT-prolonging medications.Data SourcesWe searched MEDLINE from 1966 through 2002 for all English-language articles related to the QT interval. Additional data sources included bibliographies of articles identified on MEDLINE, a survey of experts, and data presented at a meeting of experts on long QT syndrome.Study SelectionWe selected for review registries and case series examining clinical outcomes of patients with prolonged QT interval and the effect of different methods of measurement of the QT interval on patient outcomes. Ten studies were identified, of which 6 were included in the analysis.Data ExtractionData quality was determined by publication in the peer-reviewed literature.Data SynthesisOptimal measurement of the QT interval is problematic because of lack of standardization and lack of data regarding the best way to adjust for heart rate. Reliable information on the proper use of QT-prolonging medications is scarce. Although a QT interval of at least 500 milliseconds generally has been shown to correlate with a higher risk of torsades de pointes, there is no established threshold below which prolongation of the QT interval is considered free of proarrhythmic risk. The risk of torsades de pointes should be assessed in patients who are about to begin taking a QT-prolonging medication. Although inadequate clinical studies preclude prediction of absolute risk for individual patients, particularly high-risk situations can be defined based on clinical variables. We propose recommendations on proper monitoring of the QT interval in patients receiving QT-prolonging medications.ConclusionAlthough the use of QT-prolonging medications can predispose to torsades de pointes, there is a relative paucity of information that can help clinicians and patients make optimal informed decisions about how best to minimize the risk of this serious complication.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Increased Risk of Arrhythmic Events in Long-QT Syndrome With Mutations in the Pore Region of the Human Ether-a-go-go–Related Gene Potassium ChannelCirculation, 2002
- Problems of Heart Rate Correction in Assessment of Drug‐Induced QT Interval ProlongationJournal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 2001
- The long QT syndromes: genetic basis and clinical implicationsJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2000
- “Optimum” Formulae for Heart Rate Correction of the QT IntervalPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1999
- Comparison of Formulae for Heart Rate Correction of QT Interval in Exercise ElectrocardiogramsPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1999
- Influence of the Genotype on the Clinical Course of the Long-QT SyndromeNew England Journal of Medicine, 1998
- Rate-corrected QT interval: Techniques and limitationsThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1993
- The long QT syndrome. Prospective longitudinal study of 328 families.Circulation, 1991
- Variability of the QT measurement in healthy men, with implications for selection of an abnormal QT value to predict drug toxicity and proarrhythmiaThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1991
- The Ventricular Paced QT Interval—The Effects of Rate and ExercisePacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1982