SELECTIVE PREDATION BY TWO SWIFTS AND A SWALLOW IN CENTRAL AMERICA
- 1 January 1975
- Vol. 117 (1) , 82-99
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919x.1975.tb04189.x
Abstract
Summary: Samples of flying insects were made at three sites and during dry and wet seasons in Costa Rica and at two sites during the wet season in Panama. Compared with these were the diets of three aerially foraging birds: the Band‐rumped Swift Chaetura spinicauda and Rough‐winged Swallow Stelgidopteryx ruficollis in Costa Rica and the Short‐tailed Swift Chaetura brachyura in Panama.Among insects flying, Diptera accounted for between 52 and 75%, with smaller numbers of Hymenoptera (mean = 15%) and Coleoptera (10%). In bird stomach contents, however, Hymenoptera predominated (59–81%), Coleoptera were less common (mean = 18.5%) and Diptera least common (3.4%) of the three orders. The discrepancy between diets and samples of flying insects could not be accounted for solely on the basis of differential digestion. The composition of the swift and swallow diets was similar; there were no significant seasonal differences in the taxonomic composition of the diet of Chaetura spinicauda.Size distributions of beetle prey fitted log‐normal distributions in every case. Mean size of prey was significantly larger than that of insects available in all comparisons. Although there was no seasonal difference in the mean size of prey of Chaetura spinicauda, the variance in prey size, used as a measure of niche width, was significantly larger in the wet than in the dry season. Although insect densities may be higher, foraging time is reduced and the wet season is likely the worse season. This result therefore supports Emlen's hypothesis of narrower niches under optimal conditions and broader niches under suboptimal conditions.For increasing altitude above ground published data show a decrease in the density of insects flying, a decrease in the proportions of taxa favoured by the birds, and a significant decrease in the mean size of beetles. None of these trends can explain the differences between the birds' diets and the samples of flying insects.Preference of prey by these birds is concluded not to be a function of prey size alone, but to involve interaction among prey size, ease of capture, and local density. Because of different flight abilities, insect taxa will differ in ease of capture and, consequently, in mean size preferred by the predator, as well as proportions in the diet. This factor favours Hymenoptera and Coleoptera over Diptera as prey. Local concentrations of winged ants, bees and social wasps, and fig wasps make these prey differentially easy to exploit and explain the preference of Hymenoptera over Coleoptera. Large species of swifts are hypothesized to be the evolutionary consequence of the tendency of aerially foraging birds to exploit local concentrations of single prey species.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- A novel mimicry complex: beetles and fliesJournal of Entomology Series A, General Entomology, 1973
- Host Specificity of Fig Wasps (Agaonidae)Evolution, 1970
- The Diversity of the Insect Fauna in a Hedgerow and Neighbouring FieldsJournal of Applied Ecology, 1969
- SEASONAL VARIATION IN THE FOOD OF THE PURPLE MARTIN PROGNE SUBIS IN KANSASIbis, 1967
- The Role of Time and Energy in Food PreferenceThe American Naturalist, 1966
- A Seasonal Study of Aerial Insects Close to a Moorland StreamJournal of Animal Ecology, 1965
- DIPTERA SWARMING HIGH ABOVE THE FOREST CANOPY IN UGANDA, WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO TABANIDAEEcological Entomology, 1962
- ENTOMOLOGICAL STUDIES FROM A HIGH TOWER IN MPANGA FOREST, UGANDAEcological Entomology, 1961
- THE COMPARISON OF SUCTION TRAP, STICKY TRAP and TOW‐NET FOR THE QUANTITATIVE SAMPLING OF SMALL AIRBORNE INSECTSAnnals of Applied Biology, 1950
- The Distribution of Spiders and Mites up to 300 Ft. in the AirJournal of Animal Ecology, 1946