Electromagnetic wave speed in polar ice: validation of the common-midpoint technique with high-resolution dielectric-profiling and γ-density measurements
- 1 January 2002
- journal article
- Published by International Glaciological Society in Annals of Glaciology
- Vol. 34, 150-156
- https://doi.org/10.3189/172756402781817509
Abstract
The accuracy of the travel-time–velocity and travel-time–depth profile derived from ground-penetrating radar (GPR) common-midpoint (CMP) surveys at different frequencies is investigated for the first time ever by direct comparison with the profile calculated from high-resolution dielectric-profiling (DEP) ice-core data. In addition, we compare two travel-time profiles calculated from ice-core density data by means of different dielectrical mixture models with the DEP-based profile. CMP surveys were carried out at frequencies of 25,50,100 and 200 MHz near the new European deep-drilling site DML05 in Dronning Maud Land, Antarctica, during the 1998/99 field season. An improved scanning capacitor for high-resolution DEP and a γ-densiometer for density measurements were used to determine the complex dielectric constant and the density at 5 mm increments along the ice core B32, retrieved in 1997/98 at DML05. The comparisons with DEP- and density-based velocity series show that the CMP velocity series are slightly higher but asymptotically approach the core-based velocities with depth. Root-mean-square differences of the DEP velocity series range between 8% for the 25 MHz CMP and 2% in the case of the 200 MHz survey. Density-based velocities differ from the DEP velocities by 51 %. The travel-time–depth series calculated from the interval velocities show a better agreement between all series than the velocity series. Differences are 5.7–1.4% for the 25 and 200 MHz CMP measurements, and <0.6% for the density data. Based on these comparisons, we evaluate the accuracy with which the depth of electromagnetic reflectors observed in common-offset profiles can be determined, and discuss reasons for the observed differences between CMP- and core-based profiles. Moreover, we compare the errors determined from the field measurements with those estimated from GPR system characteristics to provide a measure that can be used to estimate the accuracy of GPR analyses for the planning of GPR campaigns. Our results show that CMP surveys are a useful technique to determine the depth of radar reflectors in combination with common-offset measurements, especially on a region-wide basis.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Dielectric constants of heterogeneous mixturesPublished by Elsevier ,2002
- Glacier surge propagation by thermal evolution at the bedJournal of Geophysical Research, 2000
- A comparison of radio-echo sounding data and electrical conductivity of the GRIP ice coreJournal of Glaciology, 2000
- New maps of the ice thickness and subglacial topography in Dronning Maud Land, Antarctica, determined by means of airborne radio-echo soundingAnnals of Glaciology, 1999
- Precise dielectric profiling of ice cores: a new device with improved guarding and its theoryJournal of Glaciology, 1998
- Velocity variations and water content estimated from multi‐offset, ground‐penetrating radarGeophysics, 1996
- High-resolution radar on Ice Stream B2, Antarctica: measurements of electromagnetic wave speed in firn and strain history from buried crevassesAnnals of Glaciology, 1994
- Acquisition and processing of wide‐aperture ground‐penetrating radar dataGeophysics, 1992
- RadioglaciologyPublished by Springer Nature ,1985
- SEISMIC VELOCITIES FROM SURFACE MEASUREMENTSGeophysics, 1955